Someone you know may still be wondering what are the real differences between the candidates in the district 3 council race. We decided to highlight  those differences to help you and your friends, family, neighbors and colleagues cast an informed vote. If you’re struck by the sharp contrasts, please recommend your friends take a look.

We’ve prepared a handy comparison chart and a list of corrections to Jerry’s misrepresentations of fact during the campaign. I encourage you to check them out.
 
I also want to share with you this question I asked at a recent forum about my opponent’s voting record. He offered the audience no explanation of these votes. If Jerry will answer them I would be happy to share his responses with you.
 
My Question: Jerry, your campaign treasurer has one of the biggest local developers as a client. The Housing and Building Association endorses and funds your campaigns. Numerous developers and other growth profiteers have contributed to your campaigns. Yet you swear they do not exert any undue influence on your decisions.
 
If that’s the case, how do you explain these votes?
 
●     2004 - you voted against UPAC recommendation to instate electric and gas tap fees

●     2004 - you voted to approve WoodmenHeights annexation, which guaranteed Failing Level of Service at two major intersections on Woodmen Road

●     2008 - you voted against implementing an annexation fee to help fund construction of the badly needed Northern Service Facility

●     2008 - you voted to nearly double the amount Utilities proposed for Economic Development Corporation funding in the 2009 budget, even as water rates were projected to increase by over 40%
 
These are just a few examples of a record that appears to put one special interest ahead of the needs of the entire community. If that’s not the case, help us understand why.